Home Abortion Aids & Hiv Euthanasia Homosexuality Lebanon Natural Family Planning Contact Me   
Daily News  
Photo Album
Arabic Church News
Arabic Church Titles
Arabic Encyclopedia
Catechism of the Catholic Church
Church History
Code of Eastern Canon Law
Code of Western Canon Law
Council for Justice and Peace
Papal Documents
Papal Encyclicals
Paths of the Spirit
Pontifical Academy for Life
The 21 Ecumenical Councils
The Catholic Encyclopedia
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The Fathers of the Church
The Holy Father
The II Vatican Council
The List of Popes
The Mysteries of the Rosary
Way of the Cross
Question and Answer
- Faith FAQs
Your name:
Your email:
   Subscribe Unsubscribe
Latest Posts
- LITURGY Q & A: Deacons and Baptisms in Extraordinary Form
- LITURGY Q & A: Proper Posture at the Sequence
- Transferring Obligatory Memorials
- LITURGY Q & A: Using a Ciborium as a Chalice
- Pro-Life Chairman for US Bishops Urges Passage of Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act
- Tv Charity
- Radio Maria
- Radio Charity - Lebanon
Slide Shows & Movies
- Psalm 23
- Be United Against...
- You Are Mine
- Abortion
- Mother Teresa
- Promise
  May 2019  
Number Of Visitors:
US Headed Beyond Roe. Vs. Wade, Prelate Warns. Bill Could Make Abortion an "Entitlement"
ST. PAUL, Minnesota, OCT. 30, 2008 (Zenit.org).- When U.S. Congress debates the Freedom of Choice Act in January, it will be considering going even beyond the Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, says a Minnesota prelate.

Archbishop John Nienstedt of St. Paul-Minneapolis affirmed this in a Wednesday article in the Catholic Spirit newspaper.

"If enacted, this would become the first time in our nation's history that abortion is established as an 'entitlement,'" the archbishop warned. "This, in effect, would move our country beyond even the Supreme Court's decision of Roe v. Wade.

"It would also do away with a large number of existing state laws on abortion, substantially impede the ability of states to regulate abortion, and override nearly 40 years of jurisprudential experience on the subject of abortion.

"Legal experts say it would likely invalidate informed consent laws, parental notification laws, laws promoting maternal health -- if they result in an increased cost for abortions, abortion clinic regulations -- even those designed to make abortion safer for women, laws prohibiting a particular abortion procedure -- such as partial-birth abortion, and laws requiring that abortions only be performed by a licensed physician."

More radical?

The Minnesota prelate said it "is hard to imagine a more radical piece of pro-abortion legislation. FOCA would have a devastatingly destructive impact on the government's ability to regulate abortion."

Archbishop Nienstedt urged the faithful to contact Congressional representatives and tell them to vote against the bill.

"In effect, FOCA would certainly be a boon to the abortion industry with the government forced to condone and promote such procedures," the archbishop concluded. "Now is the time to reduce, not increase, the incidence of abortion. Now is the time to work for the defeat of the Freedom of Choice Act."