Home Abortion Aids & Hiv Euthanasia Homosexuality Lebanon Natural Family Planning Contact Me   
Daily News  »
Archives
Photo Album
Arabic Church News
Arabic Church Titles
Arabic Encyclopedia
Arabic Vatican News
Catechism of the Catholic Church
Church History
Code of Eastern Canon Law
Code of Western Canon Law
Council for Justice and Peace
Papal Documents
Papal Encyclicals
Paths of the Spirit
Pontifical Academy for Life
Saints & Angels
The 21 Ecumenical Councils
The Catholic Encyclopedia
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The Fathers of the Church
The Holy Father
The II Vatican Council
The List of Popes
The Mysteries of the Rosary
The New Jerusalem Bible
Way of the Cross
Question and Answer
- Faith FAQs
 
Newsletter
Your name:
   
Your email:
   
   Subscribe Unsubscribe
 
Latest Posts
- Distribution of Communion by Non-attendees
- Coadjutors in the Eucharistic Prayer
- LITURGY Q & A: Priest’s Private Prayer Before Communion
- Liturgy Q & A: Administering the Chalice
- Administering the Chalice
 
   
Media
- Tv Charity
- Radio Maria
- Radio Charity - Lebanon
 
Slide Shows & Movies
- Psalm 23
- Be United Against...
- You Are Mine
- Abortion
- Mother Teresa
- Promise
 
Calendar
  December 2018  
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number Of Visitors:
421013
 
South Dakota Women to be Told Abortion Ends a Life. State's Informed Consent Law Passes Legal Hurdle
PIERRE, South Dakota, JULY 4, 2008 (Zenit.org).- Abortion providers in South Dakota should soon have to tell women that the procedure ends a human life.

A 7-4 decision by the full 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week ruled against a stay on the state's informed consent law, passed by the legislature in 2005.

The law stipulates that a woman be informed that abortion "will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being," and that the woman has an existing, constitutional relationship with her unborn child.

Planned Parenthood, South Dakota's only abortion provider, challenged the law as a violation of abortionists' free speech. The district court had prevented the law from taking effect while the case was being decided.

The July 27 ruling of the federal appeals threw out the order, saying Planned Parenthood had not provided enough evidence to prove that the statement was not true. As a result, the court said, the statement is not ideological, but factual, and thus could not be considered a violation of abortionists' rights.

The ruling sends the case back to the Rapid City District Court judge to determine if the law is constitutional.

Supporters of the law affirm that women have the right to be informed before making a decision on abortion.

State Attorney General Larry Long, who defended the law, told the Associated Press that the state can probably begin enforcing the law within weeks.

"The bottom line," Long said, "is if the state legislature orders a professional to tell the truth, that's not a violation of the First Amendment."